General
"Beehave", the bee behavior
laboratory, opened in 1994, aims to use bumblebees foraging on
artificial flowers as a model system to study interactive
decision-making in animals. The laboratory is run by a group of
ecologists from the Life Sciences Institute of The Hebrew
University. The laboratory contains two flight rooms, a control
room for observers, and a office/storage space. Experiments
involve individually marked bees with known foraging histories,
and groups of unidentified bees. Two sets of 48 artificial
flowers, which dispense discrete units of sugar solution to the
bees, were designed and built in order to obtain precise
information on the bees' foraging decisions. The color, shape,
size and spatial distribution of the 'flowers' can be
manipulated. The system allows control over the temporal and
spatial reward schedule offered to the bees. Flower visitation
sequence, as well as time allocation to feeding and flight, are
recorded automatically for each individual.


People
The BeeHave group members are:
Rachel Arnon
Noam Bar Sha
Prof. Dan Cohen
Tal Fuchs
Dr. Tamar Keasar
Prof Uzi Motro
Prof. Avi Shmida


Projects
1. Search image and flight-time dynamics.
Shifting between food sources is time-consuming for bees. Does
this task become easier with practice?
2. The evolution of colored bracts in flowers.
Several species of flowers carry a 'flag' of colored, sterile,
bracts at the top of their inflorescences. Do these bracts serve
a role in the pollination of these plants?
3. Probability matching in bees.
How do bees allocate time between two food sources that give out
food with different probabilities?
4. Numerical abilities in bees
Bees may benefit from knowing how many food items are available
to them. Can bees count?


Selected Publications
Keasar T, Motro U, Shur Y and Shmida
A, 1996. Overnight memory retention of foraging bumblebees in
imperfect. Animal Behavior 52:95-104.
Keasar T, Shmida A and Motro U, 1996. Innate movement
rules in foraging bees: flight distances are affected by recent
rewards and are correlated with choice of flower type. Behavioral
Ecology and Sociobiology 39:381-388.
Keasar T, Bilu Y, Motro U and Shmida A, 1997. Foraging
choices of bumblebees on equally-rewarding artificial flowers of
different colors. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 45:219-229.
Goubitz S, Keasar T and Shmida A., 1998 Age-related flower
sampling in bumble bees: an analysis of unsuccessful foragers.
Discussion paper no. 158, Center for Rationality and Interactive
Decision Theory, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Keasar T, Fershtman I, Forotan R and Shmida A., 1998
Learning performance of foraging bees during manipulation of
inter-visit intervals. Discussion paper no. 176, Center for
Rationality and Interactive Decision Theory, The Hebrew
University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Blarer A, Keasar T and Shmida A., 1998. Does learning of
flower size by foraging bumblebees involve concept formation?
Discussion paper no. 177, Center for Rationality and Interactive
Decision Theory, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Keasar T, 2000. The spatial distribution of non-rewarding
artificial flowers affects pollinator attraction. Animal
Behaviour 60:639-646.
Rashkovich E, Keasar T, Cohen D, Shmida A. , 2000. Choice
behavior of bees in two-armed bandit situations: experiments and
possible decision rules. Discussion paper no. 226 , Center for
Rationality and Interactive Decision Theory, The Hebrew
University, Jerusalem, Israel.


Related Links
The Hebrew
University Life Sciences Institute
Rotem - The Israel
Plant Information Database
The Animal Behavior Course
